Document Type : Original Article


Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI),


Nowadays CMM machines are widely used in surface measurement and inspection. As inspection results from CMM machine are obtained by the means of measuring surfaces with direct contact, they are more precise than non-contact method (like optical measurement). However, CMM machines give more reliable and accurate results rather than non-contact methods but also these results come with error when outer surface contains porosity spaces. This paper proposes a new method for measuring outer surface of porous objects. In this method the probe will be located above the porous area and doesn’t enter inside. The proposed strategy could be utilized whether CAD model of object is available or not. If CAD drawing of object exists, the probing stylus will not enter into the hole. On the other hand, if the CAD drawing doesn’t exist a perpendicular plane to the surface will be virtually modeled and by this normal plane the outer surface of the object will be estimated. In addition in this research an effort has been made to reduce dependence on CAD drawing.


[1]  Haji M., “Why Portable CMM?”, Manuf. Eng. J., (In Persian) Vol. 4, No. 17, 2007, P.22-28.
[2]  Kamrani AK, Nasr EA Reverse, Engineering: A Review & Evaluation of Non-Contact Based Systems, Rapid Prototyping: Theory and Practice, Springer, New York, 2006, Chaps. 7, pp.35.
[3]  Bazmi F., “CMMs and Laser Probes”, Manu. Eng. J., Vol.5, No. 20, 2007, P.34-41.
[4]   Ye Li, Naveen P., S. Joseph, “Measuring External Profiles of Porous Objects Using CMM”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vo1. 5, No. 3, 2012, pp.12-20, DOI 10.1007/s00170-012-4010-x.
[5]   Lu CG, Morton D, Wu MH, Myler P, “Genetic Algorithm Modeling and Solution of Inspection Path Planning on a Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM).“ Int. J. Adv. Manuf Tech, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1999, pp. 409–416.
[6]  Albuquerque V., Liou F., Mitchell O., “Inspection Point Placement and Path Planning Algorithms for Automatic CMM Inspection”, Int. J. Computer Integrated Manuf. Vol. 13, No. 2, 2000, pp. 107–120.
[7] Zussman E, Schuler H, Seliger G, “Analysis of the Geometrical Feature Detectability Constraints for Laser-Scanner Sensor Planning”, Int. J Adv Manuf. Tech, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1994, pp.56–64.
[8]  Xi F., Shu C, “CAD-Based Path Planning for 3-D Line Laser Scanning”, Computer Aided Des. Vol. 31, No. 14, 1999, pp. 473–479.
[9]  Chiang Y., Chen F. L., “CMM Probing Accessibility in a Single Slot”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., Vol. 15, No. 2, 1999, pp.261–267.
[10] Huan-Chung C., Tsann-Rong L., “A Novel Reverse Measurement and Manufacturing of Conjugate Cams in a Diesel Engine”, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., Vol. 26, No.4, 2005, pp.41–46.
[11] Bradley C., Chan V., “A complementary Sensor Approach to Reverse Engineering”, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans, Vol. 123, No. 5, (2001), pp.74–81.
[12] Mohib A., Azab A., ElMaraghy H., “Feature-Based Hybrid Inspection Planning: a Mathematical Programming Approach”, Int. J. Comp. Integrated Manuf. Vol. 22, No.1, 2009, pp.13–29.
[13] Frank M., Hunt C., Anderson D., McKinley T., Brown T., “Maintenance of Surface Porosity When Using Subtractive Rapid Prototyping for Bone Replacement”, 55th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Las Vegas, NV, 2009.
[14] Kim JY, Park E., Kim S., Shin J., Cho D., “Fabrication of a SFF-based Three-Dimensional Scaffold Using a Precision Deposition System in Tissue Engineering”, J. Micro. Mech. Micro. eng. Vol. 18., No. 5, 2008, pp.55-68.
[15] Lam C., Mo X.., Teoh S., Hutmacher D., “Development Using 3D Printing With a Starch-based Polymer”, Mater Sci. Eng. C., Vol. 20, No. 1-2, 2002, pp: 49–56.
[16] Li Y., Gu P., “Free-Form Surface Inspection Techniques State of the art Review”, Computer Aided Des., Vol.36, No. 13, 2004, pp.1395–1417.
[17] Zhao F., Xu X., Xie S., “Computer-Aided Inspection Planning—the State of the art.”, Computer Industry, Vol. 60, No. 7, 2009, pp.453–466.
[18] Chiang Y., Chen F., “Sculptured Surface Reconstruction From CMM Measurement Data by a Software Iterative Approach”, Int. J. Prod. Res., Vol. 37, No.8, 1999, pp.1679–1695.